After fourteen years of campaigning, rights groups on Friday gave a sigh of relief when the International Criminal Court in the Hague delivered its first-ever order for financial reparations to victims of war crimes.
“The decision is hugely significant,” Juergen Schurr, Head of Law and Policy at the human rights organisation Redress, told RFI.
“It comes about fourteen years after the brutal attack, and so it’s long overdue that victims of that attack do receive some form of tangible justice.”
The devastation caused by the 2003 attack on Bogoro village was total: Around 200 civilians were murdered, many others mutilated and women and girls forced into being sex slaves by the men of former warlord Germain Katanga.
“The damage was so colossal that no one can repair this 100%,” Alain Uaykani, a former child soldier with a rival warlord at the time, told RFI by phone from Kinshasa.
“If you go to Bogoro, this is an area that almost disappeared off the map. So in terms of justice, this reparation is significant because it means the victims have not been forgotten.”
In total, the court calculated that the survivors had suffered $3.75 million (around 3.5 million euros) in damages. Of this amount, it found that militia leader Germain Katanga was personally responsible for just under 1 million euros.
“In deciding what reparations to award, the chamber really relied on the needs that were expressed by the victims,” Oriane Maillet, Associate Public Affairs Officer for the International Criminal Court told RFI.
“It also consulted the defence and they decided that two types of reparation should be awarded to the victims: on the one hand individual reparation but also collective reparation consisting of long-term projects, focusing on things like support for housing, income activities, education and psychological support.”
In addition to the collective damages, each victim was awarded a symbolic amount of $250 (around 230 euros) in compensation.
While not intended to compensate the victims entirely, the court said it was “a symbolic amount which would provide meaningful relief to the victims for the harm they suffered.”
Where’s the money?
One aspect though that needs to be fine-tuned is how the victims will actually be paid.
Germain Katanga, who’s currently serving 12 years in jail for war crimes, doesn’t have the means to pay.
So the independent Trust Fund for Victims–a body set up under the ICC–will try to cover the cost of the reparations.
A separate ruling on reparations for the victims of another convicted warlord Thomas Lubanga is expected to follow.
Case of Thomas Lubanga
“Thomas Lubanga was the first to be tried by the Court, even before Germain Katanga, and yet his victims have been waiting for so long and they don’t know what’s going on,” says former child soldier Alain Uaykani.
“The heart of this case was an ethnic fight, and if the Court doesn’t pay attention it will stir up those same feelings again that others are more prioritized than others.”
But for Juergen Schurr of Redress, Friday’s decision can serve as a catalyst to end impunity.
“The fact that the reparations in the Lubanga case are delayed, shouldn’t mean that the victims in the Katanga case should equally wait a long time for their reparations to come forward.”
Last October judges approved symbolic reparations to create a living memorial for Lubanga’s victims. “And we are now also in the same phase for the [Jean Pierre] Bemba case, so more decisions will be coming on those issues soon,” insists Oriane Maillet.
“The success of the court will depends on how it delivers on its mandate to ensure all victims receive reparations,” concludes Schurr.
Source: rfi afrique